-
10th Asia-Pacific Microscopy Conference
Perth, Australia,
Feb 05, 2012
-
2012 Microanalytical Reference Materials TC
Golden, CO,
May 15, 2012
-
IFES 2012
Tuscaloosa, AL,
May 21, 2012
-
EBSD 2012
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA,
Jun 19, 2012
-
Microscopy & Microanalysis 2012
Phoenix, AZ,
Jul 29, 2012
-
CORALS-2013
Vienna, Austria,
Jul 03, 2013
|
- Info
2011 Tour Speaker Program
MAS provides interesting technical speakers for meetings of its Affiliated Regional Societies (AReS).
| Speaker |
Bio |
Title |
Abstract |
Ed Vicenzi
 |
Edward Vicenzi is a research scientist
and microanalysis expert at the Smithsonian Institution’s Museum
Conservation Institute. He uses a variety of techniques to probe
natural materials to understand their origin and history. Ed has
previously served as a researcher at the US National Museum of
Natural History, a staff member at Princeton University, and a
postdoctoral fellow at Macquarie University in Australia. He
obtained his BSc from McGill University, MS from the University of
Oregon, and his PhD from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute all in
Earth Sciences.
|
Microanalysis of
Martian Salts From The Comfortof Your Laboratory
|
Over the past
decade information regarding minerals precipitated from ancient
bodies of water on Mars has become available from spectrometers/cameras systems mounted on orbital spacecraft. Ground-based studies of rocks by the Mars Exploration Rovers have added significant, and unique, detail to our understanding of these deposits. Microanalysis of carbonates and sulfates in Martian
meteorites yield perhaps the greatest wealth of chemical data concerning their origin, as these specimens are available in-hand for
Earth-based laboratory studies. One drawback to meteorite analysis of Martian salts is the potential terrestrial overprinting for samples that have been subjected to Earth’s
atmosphere/hydrosphere for 1000s of years in some cases.
Careful microscale examination of these precious specimens give clues
to which materials formed preterrestrially (on Mars) versus those
that formed after their arrival on Earth.
|
Robert Simmons  |
Robert Simmons is a native of Atlanta,
Georgia. He earned his Bachelor of Science (Hons) degree in
biological sciences at the University of Ulster, and continued with
MS and Ph.D. degrees at Georgia State University. He joined the
Biology Department at Georgia State University in 1983 and is the
Program Director for Biological Imaging. He teaches laboratory
courses for TEM and SEM plus a survey of imaging technology lecture
course at Georgia State. His main research involves the interaction
of microorganisms with the human environment, with an emphasis on
fungi and air handling systems. Recent work of a slightly different
nature includes X-ray microanalysis of glass used for making art
glass jewelry.
|
Microorganisms and You: A Tale of
Cohabitation
|
Many microorganisms are primarily
recyclers. Their main function in the environment is to break down
complex materials, which allows the components to be re-used by other
organisms. These complex materials include dead plants, dead animals,
building materials, valued artifacts of civilization and any number
of other things. Problems arise when these organisms invade the
built environment such working/ living spaces or even the air handing
systems of our vehicles. Various methods, such as air sampling,
surface cultures and bulk sample analysis have been used to estimate
the density of organisms in a given environment. Volumetric sampling
may indicate high levels of fungi or one particular fungus in a
building compared to the outdoor environment or some predetermined
standard. This method may indicate the presence of viable fungal
conidia or hyphal fragments in the air column but it cannot identify
sites of fungal colonization. Surface cultures may indicate the
presence of viable fungal propagules but do not prove colonization.
Surface sampling for light microscopy using clear adhesive tape
mounts may demonstrate the presence of colonizing fungi. The
methodology, such as types of tape and optics employed may affect
the results obtained. Examination of tape samples from environmental
surfaces may show the level of colonization and, in many cases, allow
for identification of colonizing species. Electron microscopy
studies of suspect materials may determine the nature of surface
features and types of microbial contamination not readily
identifiable in the light microscope. Suspect materials may be shown
to be biological in nature or non-biological surface. Microanalysis
of materials may yield clues to the origin of non-biological
contamination. Rapid and accurate analysis of suspect materials on
indoor surfaces is vital to the identification of potential microbial
colonization sites. These data may be used as an aid to determining
an appropriate course of action.
|
| Previous Years Speakers |
|
|
|
Paul Hlava  |
Paul Hlava recently retired from Sandia National Laboratories in
Albuquerque, New Mexico after 33 years. He worked in the electron
microprobe laboratory (as staff member in charge of the lab since 1980) the entire time. Because the EMP lab is part of the Materials
Characterization Department, a centralized analytical facility for
Sandia, Paul got to work on a wide variety of (prosaic to exotic)
materials and projects. He normally analyzed many alloys and joins (welds, brazes, solders, metal to ceramic, glass/metal seals, etc.) but
also did work on high tech ceramics, low-temperature superconductors,
electronic materials, phosphors, contamination, corrosion, failure
analyses, nuclear waste simulants, thermal batteries, et hoc genus omne.
As a result, he has written, co-authored, and/or presented over a
hundred papers on a wide variety of materials.
Paul graduated from the University of New Mexico with a geology MS in
1974. At UNM he worked as a research graduate doing probe research
under Klaus Keil
in the Institute of Meteoritics. He worked on moon rocks, Hawaiian
basalts, ultramafic rocks, meteorites, and inclusions in diamonds. Paul
occasionally uses his geological and mineralogical expertise on Sandia
projects but also does some personal research on minerals. He has been
co-discoverer and co-author on the descriptions of several new mineral
species.
Paul stays active in the area of geology, mineralogy, crystallography,
and gemology. He has been president of the Albuquerque Gem and Mineral
Club three times. He is the Chair for AGMC's annual show,
geological/mineralogical expert for the New Mexico Facetors Guild, and
often gives talks on geological/mineralogical/ crystallographic/ gemmological subjects. About twenty years ago, Paul started a side
business, Access to Gems and Minerals, Inc., dealing in gemstones,
jewelry, and related items. This has not only given him access to
wholesale rooms full of gemstones but it has piqued his interest in the
research side of this field. He has given several well-received talks
on gem related subjects such as this one.
Since retirement Paul has dabbled in penny stocks. Buying low isn’t difficult it’s the selling high that takes skill.
|
The Materials Known as Gemstones |
Unlike most materials, gemstones are prized for beauty first; all other properties are of secondary interest. Other materials are chosen
for various applications because they are strong or weak, hard or soft,
insulating or conductive, transparent or opaque, et hoc genus omne. In
defining gem and gemstone, I will show that some properties, such as
hardness, durability, cleavage, etc. are also considered important.
These definitions also introduce properties such as rarity and high cost
or intrinsic value. By discussing the BIG seven (the more precious of
the gemstones – diamond, emerald, ruby, sapphire, tanzanite, opal, and
pearls – or DERSTOP), I will show how arbitrary is our consideration of these other properties compared to the all important property of beauty.
A brief mention of other gemstones will illustrate the many varieties
of beauty desired by people.
Crystal form is a property of the “rough” gem material which, unexpectedly, often carries over into the shape of the polished gemstone. The shape of the original crystals and the desire to waste as
little of this most valuable material as possible are mostly
responsible for the creation of the standard round brilliant cut of the
diamond, the emerald cut of the emerald, and the ovals of ruby and
sapphire. I shall mention where history has also played a part in
determining these gemstone shapes.
I will discuss the distinctions between natural, synthetic, and simulated gemstones. Because natural gemstones (mined from the Earth,
then ground to shape and polished) are so valuable and pricey, people
(some with honorable intentions and some not) have been working to make
lower cost substitutes. There have been many successes. Synthetic
gemstones (also known as lab-grown, “cultured”, etc.) are medium- to
low-cost materials of the correct chemical composition and physical
properties. Simulants may look like a particular gemstone but are
inexpensive to cheap (in all ways) substitutes for the “real” thing.
I will end with general guidelines to the properties one should consider
when purchasing a gemstone. The guidelines for diamonds is quite
specific and considers the properties of color, clarity, cut, and carat
weight (the 4 C’s of diamond buying). The guidelines for colored stones
are more generalized.
*This talk was originally developed for the Albuquerque chapter of ASM
International, “The Materials Information Society,” ergo the emphasis on
properties.
|
Paul Kotula
or
Joe Michael
 |
Paul Kotula is a Principal Member of Technical Staff
in the Materials Characterization Department at Sandia National
Laboratories in Albuquerque, NM. Paul received his B.S. from Cornell
University and Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota, both in Materials
Science and Engineering. Before joining Sandia, he was a Postdoctoral
Fellow at Los Alamos National Laboratory. His work at Sandia includes
analytical electron microscopy support for microelectronic and
micro-electromechanical device development, welding, brazing, soldering,
forensics, process feedback, failure analysis, and 3D materials
characterization and microanalysis. He has helped build a research
program on spectral imaging and automated multivariate statistical
analysis. The software developed from this work for x-ray microanalysis
is commercially available from Thermo Fisher Scientific and is now in
over 500-labs worldwide. It is also in research-form in over 25-labs
worldwide. Paul’s work has also garnered several awards over the years,
among them an R&D 100 Award in 2002, two Best Analytical Techniques
paper of the year in the journal Microscopy and Microanalysis (2003,
2006) and the Heinrich Award for outstanding young scientist from MAS in
2008.
Paul has been an Adjunct Professor in the Department of Materials
Science and Engineering at North Carolina State University since 2001
and has authored or co-authored over 70 journal articles on a wide
variety of topics involving electron microscopy and microanalysis as
well as two patents and two book chapters. He was also a Director of MAS
(2002-2004), a Tour Speaker (2003-2004) and President of the Society
(2006-2007).
Joe Michael is a Distinguished Member of the Technical
Staff at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, NM. He currently
works in the Materials Characterization Department of the Materials
Science Center where he develops and applies electron and ion microscopy
to the characterization of materials. Prior to coming to Sandia in
1990, Joe worked as a Senior Research Engineer in the Homer Research
Laboratories of the Bethlehem Steel Corporation. He received his BS,
MS and PhD. in Materials Science and Engineering from Lehigh University
in Bethlehem, Pa. Notable awards for Dr. Michael include the Microscopy
Society of America Burton Medal, an R&D 100 Award, the
International Center for Diffraction Data’s Hanawalt Award, the
Microbeam Analysis Society’s Heinrich and Presidential Science Awards,
and the ASM’s Grossman Award. Joe is a Fellow of the Microscopy
Society of America. He is a co-author of the leading textbook on
Scanning Electron Microscopy. Joe has authored many book chapters and
has published over 100 papers in the areas of materials science and
electron microscopy.
|
Microanalysis and the FBI's Amerithrax Investigation of the 2001 Anthrax Attacks |
The Anthrax attacks of 2001 in the US killed 5, sickened 22 others
and caused a significant disruption of mail and other government
facilities. Although the attack materials were for the most part
recovered (Bacillus Anthracis) in powder form in sealed envelopes, the
US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was unprepared to perform the
needed forensic analyses on these bio-weapon materials. In particular,
it was identified that microanalysis from the micro- to nano-scale was a
key missing piece of their capabilities. As a result, Sandia was asked
to analyze the materials from the attacks by early 2002 and we reached
our general conclusions within a few months. We also analyzed over 200
samples of B. anthracis between 2002 and 2008 in an attempt to discern
the method of manufacture of the attack materials.
This talk will describe Sandia's involvement in the FBI's investigation
and in particular the power of microanalysis in answering several
critical questions: Was the Bacillus Anthracis intentionally weaponized
(i.e., contain an additive to make it disperse predictably) and were the
materials from the attacks from the same source? In particular x-ray
spectral imaging (in the SEM and STEM) combined with multivariate
statistical analysis were used to answer these questions. Specimen
preparation was both by conventional microtomy and focused ion beam
(FIB) sectioning of spore preparations. In addition, significant
advances in analytical throughput were achieved by modification of a
FE-SEM with an annular Si-drift detector with a solid angle of over 1
steradian. STEM in SEM was then performed with this new hybrid
instrument in order to analyze large numbers of spores in a short time.
|
Nestor Zaluzec
 |
A senior scientist and principle investigator in the Electron
Microscopy Center at Argonne National Laboratory, Nestor is a Fellow of
both Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and the Computational Institute of
the University of Chicago, a Visiting Professor of Physics at Northern
Illinois University and a Fellow of the Microscopy Society of America.
Nestor's research includes the development of state-of-the-art
instrumentation and techniques for atomic resolution x-ray and electron
spectroscopy, analytical, and scanning confocal electron microscopy. In
addition to creating tools for science, he also uses these leading-edge
technologies to study issues in technologically important materials. His
work over the last 30 years has included studies in the areas of
structural phase transformation in metals, radiation damage in alloys,
ceramic oxides for geologic immobilization of nuclear waste materials,
elemental segregation in semiconductors devices, magnetism, genetically
engineered proteins for bio-materials nanoarrays and most recently
studies of catalysis using analytical microscopy. He was one of the
earliest to realize the potential impact of the Internet on science and
established the first TelePresence Microscopy Collaboratory, which is
serves as a model for outreach to both the scientific and education
communities, providing unencumbered access to scientific resources.
Nestor received his B.S. degree in Physics at Illinois Institute of
Technology in Chicago, and his PhD in 1978 from the Department of
Metallurgy at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
|
Have your Pi and EDS too: A Transmission X-ray Detector for Nano-Particle Analysis |
In nano-materials research, one of the ubiquitous instruments we
employ for characterization is the electron microscope. After electrons,
the signal most often measured in these instruments is the emission of
characteristic x-rays. During the last 40 years, either the solid state
Si(Li) or more recently the SDD Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS)
have been the detector most often used for this task. On one hand
these detectors are remarkably, simple and efficient devices, but on the
other there nearly always remains opportunities for improvement.
One of the factors which governs the ability to measure an x-ray signal
is the detector geometrical collection efficiency and is typically
defined in terms of the collection solid angle . For EDS systems
interfaced to a scanning electron microscope (SEM) values can range
from < 0.005 to ~0.1 sR, while in transmission or
scanning-transmission electron microscopes (TEM/STEMs) values of up to ~
0.1- 0.3 sR have become routine.
To improve this situation specifically for nano-particle characterization, a prototype 42.5 mm2
SDD x-ray detector which operates in a novel transmission configuration
has built and has been interfaced to the column of a FEG-ESEM. The
detector is enclosed in a stainless steel housing (0.75" in diameter),
while the detector crystal is protected from electron irradiation by
using a 12.5 µm thick Be window. In this geometry, nano-particle
specimens for analysis are supported on TEM grids held in a custom
built, Be shielded stage, which can be adjusted using the existing SEM
stage translation mechanisms. The SDD detector is inserted beneath the
specimen by means of a standard linear insertion mechanism interfaced
to a side entry port of the microscope. At closest distance tested the
detector solid angle just exceeds 3.14 sR. Research continues to refine
the performance and solid angle of this configuration, as well as to
consider alternative configurations for use in TEM geometries.
|
Remember that all arrangements by Affiliated Regional Societies for Tour Speakers must be made through the
MAS AReS Director.
|
|